HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Using Medicare Claims to Examine Long-term Prostate Cancer Risk of Finasteride in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

AbstractBackground:
Investigators have used administrative claims to better understand cancer outcomes when a research question cannot feasibly be examined within a study. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) showed that seven years of finasteride reduced prostate cancer (PC) risk by 25% in men age 55 years or older. However, it was unclear whether the observed reduction in PC for finasteride participants would be maintained after finasteride discontinuation.
Methods:
We examined PC diagnoses identified by PCPT study records and Medicare claims (finasteride = 9423, placebo = 9457). A Medicare-defined PC diagnosis algorithm was defined using diagnosis and procedure codes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine time to PC within prespecified follow-up windows (<6.5, 6.5-7.5, and >7.5 years) using time-dependent covariates interacting with intervention assignment to account for the PCPT protocol-specified end-of-study biopsy at seven years. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Results:
Median follow-up using the linked database was 16 years. Overall, finasteride arm participants had a 21.1% decrease in the hazard ratio of PC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.84, P < .001). The beneficial effect of finasteride in reducing the hazard ratio of PC was most pronounced in the first 7.5 years (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.77, P < .001), consistent with the original study findings; after 7.5 years, there was no increased risk of PC for finasteride arm participants (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.26, P = .18).
Conclusions:
Finasteride provides a substantial reduction in PC through 16 years of follow-up. There was no strong evidence that the benefit of finasteride diminished after the end-of-study follow-up. Utilizing Medicare claims to augment PCPT follow-up illustrates how the novel use of secondary data sources can enhance the ability to detect long-term outcomes from prospective studies.
AuthorsJoseph M Unger, Dawn L Hershman, Cathee Till, Catherine M Tangen, William E Barlow, Scott D Ramsey, Phyllis J Goodman, Ian M Thompson Jr
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute (J Natl Cancer Inst) Vol. 110 Issue 11 Pg. 1208-1215 (11 01 2018) ISSN: 1460-2105 [Electronic] United States
PMID29534197 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
Chemical References
  • 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors
  • Finasteride
Topics
  • 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biopsy
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Finasteride (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Medicare
  • Middle Aged
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prostatic Neoplasms (diagnosis, epidemiology, etiology, prevention & control)
  • Public Health Surveillance
  • United States (epidemiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: