HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The impact of early enteral nutrition on pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal anastomosis a propensity score matching analysis.

Abstract
This study was conducted to assess the clinical advantages of early enteral nutrition (EEN) in pediatric patients who underwent surgery with gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis.EEN has been associated with clinical benefits in various aspect of surgical intervention, including GI function recovery and postoperative complications reduction. Evaluable data documenting clinical advantages with EEN for pediatric patients after surgery with GI anastomosis are limited.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 575 pediatric patients undergoing surgical intervention with GI anastomosis. Among them, 278 cases were managed with EEN and the remaining cases were set as late enteral nutrition (LEN) group. Propensity score (PS) matching was conducted to adjust biases in patient selection. Enteral feeding related complications were evaluated with symptoms, including serum electrolyte abnormalities, abdominal distention, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea. Clinical outcomes, including GI function recovery, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and postoperative follow-up, were assessed according to EEN or LEN.Following PS matching, the baseline variables of the 2 groups were more comparable. There were no differences in the incidence of enteral feeding-related complications. EEN was associated with postoperative GI function recovery, including time to first defecation (3.1 ± 1.4 days for EEN vs 3.8 ± 1.0 days for LEN, risk ratio [RR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.08, P = .042). A lower total episodes of complication, including infectious complications and major complications were noted in patients with EEN than in patients with LEN (117 [45.9%] vs 137 [53.7%]; OR, 0.73, 95% CI 0.52-1.03, P = .046). Mean postoperative length of stay in the EEN group was 7.4 ± 1.8 days versus 9.2 ± 1.4 days in the LEN group (P = .007). Furthermore, the incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction was lower for patients with laxative administration compared with control, but no significant difference was attained (P = .092)EEN was safe and associated with clinical benefits, including shorten hospital stay, and reduced overall postoperative complications on pediatric patients undergoing GI anastomosis.
AuthorsQingjuan Shang, Qiankun Geng, Xuebing Zhang, Hongfang Xu, Chunbao Guo
JournalMedicine (Medicine (Baltimore)) Vol. 97 Issue 9 Pg. e0045 (Mar 2018) ISSN: 1536-5964 [Electronic] United States
PMID29489656 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Observational Study)
Topics
  • Anastomosis, Surgical (adverse effects)
  • Child, Preschool
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures (adverse effects)
  • Enteral Nutrition (adverse effects)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Perforation (surgery)
  • Intestines (surgery)
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Postoperative Care (adverse effects)
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Propensity Score
  • Recurrence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: