HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Is Shifting to a Progestin Worthwhile When Estrogen-Progestins Are Inefficacious for Endometriosis-Associated Pain?

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the proportion of patients satisfied with their treatment after a change from a low-dose oral contraceptive (OC) to norethisterone acetate (NETA) because of inefficacy of OC on pain symptoms. To this end, prospective, self-controlled study was conducted on 153 women using OC as a treatment for endometriosis and with persistence of one or more moderate or severe pain symptoms. At baseline and during 12 months after a shift from OC to oral NETA, 2.5 mg/d, pelvic pain was measured by means of a 0- to 10-point numerical rating scale and a multidimensional categorical rating scale. Variations in health-related quality of life, psychological status, and sexual function were also evaluated with validated scales. At the end of the study period, participants indicated the degree of satisfaction with their treatment according to a 5-degree scale from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. A total of 28 women dropped out of the study, the main reason was intolerable side effects (n = 15). At 12-month assessment, 70% of participants were very satisfied or satisfied with NETA treatment (intention-to-treat analysis). Statistically significant improvements were observed in health-related quality of life, psychological status, and sexual function. At per-protocol analysis, almost half of the patients (58/125) reported suboptimal drug tolerability. However, complaints were not severe enough to cause dissatisfaction, drug discontinuation, or request for surgery. These encouraging results could be used to counsel women with symptomatic endometriosis not responding to OC and to inform their decisions on modifications of disease management.
AuthorsPaolo Vercellini, Federica Ottolini, Maria Pina Frattaruolo, Laura Buggio, Anna Roberto, Edgardo Somigliana
JournalReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) (Reprod Sci) Vol. 25 Issue 5 Pg. 674-682 (05 2018) ISSN: 1933-7205 [Electronic] United States
PMID29303056 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Contraceptives, Oral
  • Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic
  • Estrogens
  • Progestins
  • Ethinyl Estradiol
  • Levonorgestrel
  • Desogestrel
  • Norethindrone Acetate
  • Norethindrone
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Contraceptives, Oral (therapeutic use)
  • Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic (therapeutic use)
  • Desogestrel (therapeutic use)
  • Endometriosis (complications)
  • Estrogens (therapeutic use)
  • Ethinyl Estradiol (therapeutic use)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Levonorgestrel (therapeutic use)
  • Norethindrone (analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Norethindrone Acetate
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pelvic Pain (drug therapy, etiology)
  • Progestins (therapeutic use)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: