Abstract | PURPOSE: To compare flowable and regular paste bulk-fill resin composites with old and new generation conventional composites that use incremental filling techniques for direct restoration of endodontically-treated teeth. METHODS: Four resin composites produced by the same company (3M-ESPE) were used: two conventional resin composites (old formulation, Z100, and new nanofilled formulation, Filtek Supreme XT); and two bulk-fill resin composites ( flowable composite, Filtek Bulk-fill Flowable associated with Filtek Supreme, and regular paste, Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior). Elastic modulus (E), Vickers hardness (VH), post-gel shrinkage (Shr), diametral tensile strength (DTS) and compressive strength (CS) were determined (n= 10) and statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Shrinkage stresses were analyzed using non-linear finite element analysis. RESULTS: CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
|
Authors | Laís Rani Sales Oliveira Schliebe, Stella Sueli Lourenço Braga, Renata Afonso da Silva Pereira, Aline Arêdes Bicalho, Crisnicaw Veríssimo, Veridiana Resende Novais, Antheunis Versluis, Carlos José Soares |
Journal | American journal of dentistry
(Am J Dent)
Vol. 29
Issue 6
Pg. 333-338
(Dec 2016)
ISSN: 0894-8275 [Print] United States |
PMID | 29178721
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Composite Resins
- Dental Materials
- Filtek Bulk Fill
- Filtek Supreme
- Z100 composite resin
- flowable hybrid composite
- Silicon Dioxide
- Zirconium
|
Topics |
- Composite Resins
(chemistry)
- Compressive Strength
- Dental Materials
(chemistry)
- Dental Restoration, Permanent
- Dental Stress Analysis
- Elastic Modulus
- Finite Element Analysis
- Hardness
- Humans
- Materials Testing
- Molar
- Root Canal Therapy
- Silicon Dioxide
- Tensile Strength
- Tooth, Nonvital
- Zirconium
|