Abstract | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty irradiation fields were analyzed. Computed tomography (CT) images acquired before treatment initiation for confirmation (Conf-CT) were obtained under the same settings as the treatment planning CT images and used to evaluate both positioning methods. The dose distributions were recalculated for Conf-CT using both BM and TM, and the dose-volume histogram parameters [V95% of clinical target volume, V5Gy(RBE) of normal lung, and acceptance ratio (ratio of cases with V95% > 95%)] were evaluated. The required margin, which in 90% of cases achieved the acceptable condition, was also examined. RESULTS: Using BM and TM, the median V95% was 98.93% and 100% (p < 0.001) and the mean V5Gy(RBE) was 135.9 and 125.8 (p = 0.694), respectively. The estimated required margins were 7.9 and 3.3 mm and increased by 53.9% and 2.5% of V5Gy(RBE), respectively, compared with planning. CONCLUSIONS: TM ensured a better dose distribution than did BM. To enable TM, volumetric imaging is crucial and should replace 2D radiographs for carbon therapy of stage I lung cancer.
|
Authors | Makoto Sakai, Yoshiki Kubota, Jun-Ichi Saitoh, Daisuke Irie, Katsuyuki Shirai, Ryosuke Okada, Masami Torikoshi, Tatsuya Ohno, Takashi Nakano |
Journal | Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
(Radiother Oncol)
Vol. 129
Issue 1
Pg. 95-100
(10 2018)
ISSN: 1879-0887 [Electronic] Ireland |
PMID | 29100701
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Topics |
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Bone and Bones
(radiation effects)
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
(radiotherapy)
- Female
- Heavy Ion Radiotherapy
(methods)
- Humans
- Lung
(radiation effects)
- Lung Neoplasms
(radiotherapy)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Patient Positioning
(methods)
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
(methods)
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
|