Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Sunitinib and pazopanib are the only two targeted therapies for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) recommended by the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pazopanib demonstrated non-inferior efficacy and a differentiated safety profile versus sunitinib in the phase III COMPARZ trial. The current analysis provides a direct comparison of the cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib from the perspective of the United Kingdom's National Health Service based on data from COMPARZ and other sources.

METHODS:

A partitioned-survival analysis model with three health states (alive with no progression, alive with progression, or dead) was used to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for pazopanib versus sunitinib over five years (duration of follow-up for final survival analysis in COMPARZ). The proportion of patients in each health state over time was based on Kaplan-Meier distributions for progression-free and overall survival from COMPARZ. Utility values were based on EQ-5D data from the pivotal study of pazopanib versus placebo. Costs were based on medical resource utilisation data from COMPARZ and unit costs from secondary sources. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty of model results.

RESULTS:

In the base case, pazopanib was estimated to provide more QALYs (0.0565, 95% credible interval [CrI]: -0.0920 to 0.2126) at a lower cost (-£1,061, 95% CrI: -£4,328 to £2,067) versus sunitinib. The probability that pazopanib yields more QALYs than sunitinib was estimated to be 76%. For a threshold value of £30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that pazopanib is cost-effective versus sunitinib was estimated to be 95%. Pazopanib was dominant in most scenarios examined in deterministic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pazopanib is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option compared with sunitinib as first-line treatment of mRCC in the United Kingdom.

• Authors: Jordan Amdahl, Jose Diaz, Arati Sharma, Jinhee Park, David Chandiwana, Thomas E Delea
• Journal: PloS one (PLoS One) Vol. 12 Issue 6 Pg. e0175920 ( 2017) ISSN: 1932-6203 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 28636648 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)

Chemical References

• Indazoles
• Indoles
• Pyrimidines
• Pyrroles
• Sulfonamides
• pazopanib
• Sunitinib

Topics

• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (economics, therapeutic use)
• Carcinoma, Renal Cell (economics, secondary)
• Cost-Benefit Analysis
• Female
• Health Care Costs
• Humans
• Indazoles
• Indoles (administration & dosage)
• Kidney Neoplasms (economics, pathology)
• Male
• Markov Chains
• Middle Aged
• Prognosis
• Pyrimidines (administration & dosage)
• Pyrroles (administration & dosage)
• Quality-Adjusted Life Years
• Sulfonamides (administration & dosage)
• Sunitinib
• Survival Rate
• United Kingdom