Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: Clinical and cost data were retrospectively compared between open and RAL LPJ performed at a single center from 2008-2015. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent LPJ: 19 open and 7 RAL. Two robot-assisted cases converted to open were included in the open group for analysis. Patients undergoing RAL LPJ had less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter surgical length of stay, and lower medication costs. Operation supply cost was higher in the RAL group. No difference in hospitalization cost was found. CONCLUSIONS: Versus the open approach, RAL LPJ performed for chronic pancreatitis shortens hospitalization and reduces medication costs; hospitalization costs are equivalent. A higher operative cost for RAL LPJ is mitigated by a shorter hospitalization. Decreased morbidity and healthcare resource economy support use of the robotic approach for LPJ when appropriate.
|
Authors | Russell C Kirks, Patrick D Lorimer, Michael Fruscione, Allyson Cochran, Erin H Baker, David A Iannitti, Dionisios Vrochides, John B Martinie |
Journal | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS
(Int J Med Robot)
Vol. 13
Issue 3
(Sep 2017)
ISSN: 1478-596X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 28548233
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Topics |
- Adult
- Costs and Cost Analysis
- Female
- Health Care Costs
- Humans
- Laparoscopy
(economics, methods)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
(economics, methods)
- Pancreaticojejunostomy
(economics, methods)
- Pancreatitis, Chronic
(economics, surgery)
- Retrospective Studies
- Robotic Surgical Procedures
(economics, methods)
- Treatment Outcome
|