HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

NEPA, a fixed oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) over multiple cycles of chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial versus oral palonosetron.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Antiemetic guidelines recommend co-administration of targeted prophylactic medications inhibiting molecular pathways involved in emesis. NEPA is a fixed oral combination of a new NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant (NETU 300 mg), and palonosetron (PALO 0.50 mg), a pharmacologically distinct 5-HT3 RA. NEPA showed superior prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) compared with oral PALO in a single chemotherapy cycle; maintenance of efficacy/safety over continuing cycles is the objective of this study.
METHODS:
This study is a multinational, double-blind study comparing a single oral dose of NEPA vs oral PALO in chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving anthracycline/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy along with dexamethasone 12 mg (NEPA) or 20 mg (PALO) on day 1. The primary efficacy endpoint was delayed (25-120 h) complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue medication) in cycle 1. Sustained efficacy was evaluated during the multicycle extension by calculating the proportion of patients with overall (0-120 h) CR in cycles 2-4 and by assessing the probability of sustained CR over multiple cycles.
RESULTS:
Of 1455 patients randomized, 1286 (88 %) participated in the multiple-cycle extension for a total of 5969 cycles; 76 % completed ≥4 cycles. The proportion of patients with an overall CR was significantly greater for NEPA than oral PALO for cycles 1-4 (74.3 vs 66.6 %, 80.3 vs 66.7 %, 83.8 vs 70.3 %, and 83.8 vs 74.6 %, respectively; p ≤ 0.001 each cycle). The cumulative percentage of patients with a sustained CR over all 4 cycles was also greater for NEPA (p < 0.0001). NEPA was well tolerated over cycles.
CONCLUSIONS:
NEPA, a convenient, guideline-consistent, fixed antiemetic combination is effective and safe over multiple cycles of chemotherapy.
AuthorsMatti Aapro, Meinolf Karthaus, Lee Schwartzberg, Igor Bondarenko, Tomasz Sarosiek, Cristina Oprean, Servando Cardona-Huerta, Vincent Hansen, Giorgia Rossi, Giada Rizzi, Maria Elisa Borroni, Hope Rugo
JournalSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (Support Care Cancer) Vol. 25 Issue 4 Pg. 1127-1135 (04 2017) ISSN: 1433-7339 [Electronic] Germany
PMID27885469 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Anthracyclines
  • Antiemetics
  • Isoquinolines
  • Pyridines
  • Quinuclidines
  • Palonosetron
  • netupitant
  • Dexamethasone
  • Cyclophosphamide
Topics
  • Adult
  • Anthracyclines (adverse effects)
  • Antiemetics (administration & dosage)
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Cyclophosphamide (adverse effects)
  • Dexamethasone (administration & dosage)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Isoquinolines (administration & dosage)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nausea (chemically induced, drug therapy)
  • Neoplasms (drug therapy)
  • Palonosetron
  • Pyridines (administration & dosage)
  • Quinuclidines (administration & dosage)
  • Vomiting (chemically induced, drug therapy)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: