Abstract | OBJECTIVE: DESIGN: Sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to an HPPT ( n = 30) and dry needling (n = 31) groups. The primary outcome measures were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), both at 1 week and 4 weeks after treatment. The secondary outcome measures were the number of painful trigger points, range of the tragus-acromioclavicular joint, the Short Form-36, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and sonoelastographic tests after a 1-week treatment. RESULTS: More improvement was seen in anxiety in the HPPT group (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the groups with regard to other parameters (P > 0.05). A decrease in tissue stiffness was only seen in the HPPT group (P < 0.05). Significant posttreatment improvements were seen on all clinical scales in both groups (P < 0.05). After a treatment period of 4 weeks, a significant improvement was also observed on the visual analog scale and NPDS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study favors the efficacy of both treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome. Although a significant decrease was shown in tissue stiffness with HPPT, neither of these treatments had an apparent superiority.
|
Authors | Rifat Aridici, Alparslan Yetisgin, Ahmet Boyaci, Ahmet Tutoglu, Erol Bozdogan, Dilek Sen Dokumaci, Nihat Kilicaslan, Nurefsan Boyaci |
Journal | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
(Am J Phys Med Rehabil)
Vol. 95
Issue 10
Pg. e149-58
(10 2016)
ISSN: 1537-7385 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 27552352
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Acupuncture Therapy
(methods)
- Adult
- Elasticity Imaging Techniques
(methods)
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Myofascial Pain Syndromes
(diagnostic imaging, therapy)
- Neck Pain
(diagnostic imaging, therapy)
- Pain Measurement
- Pain Threshold
- Treatment Outcome
- Trigger Points
- Ultrasonic Therapy
(methods)
|