Hybrid Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Abstract

The last 25 years have witnessed a steady increase in the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, it is unclear which the optimal minimally invasive approach is: totally minimally invasive or hybrid (laparoscopic assisted or thoracoscopic assisted)? The current evidence from nonrandomized control trials suggests that hybrid laparoscopic-assisted esophagectomy couples the benefits of laparoscopy and the advantages of thoracotomy, leading to reduced surgical trauma without jeopardizing survival compared with open esophagectomy. Compromised blood supply and tension on the anastomosis are two of the main factors that lead to anastomotic leakage. Recent studies have shown that a side-to-side mechanical intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is associated with low anastomotic complications. This article discusses surgical aspects and outcomes of hybrid laparoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

• Authors: Marco E Allaix, Jason M Long, Marco G Patti
• Journal: Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A (J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A) Vol. 26 Issue 10 Pg. 763-767 (Oct 2016) ISSN: 1557-9034 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 27541591 (Publication Type: Journal Article)

Topics

• Anastomosis, Surgical (adverse effects, methods)
• Anastomotic Leak (etiology)
• Esophageal Neoplasms (surgery)
• Esophagectomy (adverse effects, methods)
• Esophagus (surgery)
• Humans
• Laparoscopy (adverse effects, methods)
• Stomach (surgery)
• Thoracoscopy
• Treatment Outcome