Searching Evidences of Stroke in Animal Models: A Review of Discrepancies A Review of Discrepancies.

Abstract

So far, animal models have helped us better understand the pathophysiology of the ischemic brain damage but they could not contribute so much to clinical practice. The discrepancies in results regarding neuroprotective agents in animal experiments compared to clinical trials have not been solved. Various animal models of ischemic stroke have proven efficacy of many neuroprotective agents without any considerable result in phase III clinical trials. As is well known, stroke-related focal cerebral ischemia or cardiac arrest related global cerebral ischemia are major causes of disability and death among human subjects. Animal models are essential to evaluate the therapeutic approaches for humans. In this review, we will try to answer two important questions: 1) Which factors endanger the reliability of experimental studies of stroke on animal models? 2) How can we design our experiments to reflect the neurorestoration and/or neuroprotection mechanisms following ischemic injury, when it comes to human disease?

• Authors: Ahmet Hilmi Kaya, Hakan Erdogan, Erol Tasdemiroglu
• Journal: Turkish neurosurgery (Turk Neurosurg) Vol. 27 Issue 2 Pg. 167-173 ( 2017) ISSN: 1019-5149 [Print] Turkey
• PMID: 27337242 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)

Chemical References

• Neuroprotective Agents

Topics

• Animals
• Disease Models, Animal
• Humans
• Neuroprotective Agents (therapeutic use)
• Reproducibility of Results
• Research Design
• Stroke (drug therapy)