HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A comparison of oral milrinone, digoxin, and their combination in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure.

Abstract
We randomly assigned 230 patients in sinus rhythm with moderately severe heart failure to treatment with digoxin, milrinone, both, or placebo. The effects of each were compared during a 12-week, double-blind trial. Treatment with milrinone or digoxin significantly increased treadmill exercise time as compared with placebo (by 82 and 64 seconds respectively; 95 percent confidence limits, 44 and 123, and 30 and 100). Both treatments reduced the frequency of decompensation from heart failure, from 47 percent with placebo to 34 percent with milrinone (P less than 0.05; 95 percent confidence limits, 22 and 46) and 15 percent with digoxin (P less than 0.01; 95 percent confidence limits, 7 and 26). However, the clinical condition of 20 percent of the patients taking milrinone deteriorated within two weeks after treatment was begun, as compared with only 3 percent of those taking digoxin (P less than 0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction at rest was not significantly changed by milrinone (+0.2 percent; 95 percent confidence limits, -1.5 and 1.9), but it was increased by digoxin (+1.7 percent; P less than 0.01; 95 percent confidence limits, -0.03 and 3.4) and decreased by placebo (-2.0 percent; 95 percent confidence limits, -3.8 and -0.1). Three-month survival was related inversely to the base-line ejection fraction. Analysis of mortality from all causes according to the intention to treat suggested an adverse effect of milrinone (P = 0.064). After adjustment for an excess of patients with lower ejection fractions randomly assigned to receive milrinone, this trend was not significant (P = 0.26). Increased ventricular arrhythmias occurred more frequently in patients who received milrinone than in those who did not (18 vs. 4 percent; P less than 0.03). We conclude that milrinone significantly increased exercise tolerance and reduced the frequency of worsened heart failure. However, in the population of patients studied, milrinone or the combination of milrinone and digoxin offered no advantage over digoxin alone. Furthermore, our data suggest that milrinone may aggravate ventricular arrhythmias.
AuthorsR DiBianco, R Shabetai, W Kostuk, J Moran, R C Schlant, R Wright
JournalThe New England journal of medicine (N Engl J Med) Vol. 320 Issue 11 Pg. 677-83 (Mar 16 1989) ISSN: 0028-4793 [Print] United States
PMID2646536 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Cardiotonic Agents
  • Pyridones
  • Vasodilator Agents
  • Digoxin
  • Milrinone
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Cardiotonic Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Chronic Disease
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Digoxin (administration & dosage)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Exercise Test
  • Female
  • Heart Failure (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Milrinone
  • Pyridones (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Random Allocation
  • Stroke Volume
  • Vasodilator Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: