Abstract | OBJECTIVES: METHODS: 90 patients undergoing ESWL for kidney stones were divided into three groups; Group 1 ( n: 30, ≤ 10 mm), Group 2 (n: 28, 11 mm- ≤ 20 mm) and Group 3 (n: 32, 20- 25 mm). During 3- months follow-up, outcome of the procedure, number of cases with emergency department visits, analgesic required, re-tretatment rates, additional procedures and the changes in the QoL were evaluated. RESULTS: the number of emergency department visits and mean analgesic need; re-treatment rates and additional procedures were significantly higher in Group 3. Evaluation of the QoL scores in three groups showed that cases with larger stone still had lower scores during 3-month evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Stone size could help us to predict the possible impact of ESWL on the QoL and depending on the size of the stone treated, a well planned indication and effective management possibly by an experienced urologist could limit the changes in the QoL of the patients.
|
Authors | Cahit Sahin, A Cihangir Cetinel, Bilal Eryildirim, Murat Tuncer, Gokhan Faydaci, Kemal Sarica |
Journal | Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica
(Arch Ital Urol Androl)
Vol. 87
Issue 3
Pg. 227-32
(Sep 30 2015)
ISSN: 1124-3562 [Print] Italy |
PMID | 26428646
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Kidney Calculi
(diagnostic imaging, pathology, therapy)
- Lithotripsy
(methods)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Prospective Studies
- Quality of Life
- Retreatment
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Treatment Outcome
- Ultrasonography
|