Abstract | BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy of Cipram® with its generic, citalopram. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty adult outpatients (between 18 to 55 years of age) with a diagnosis of MADD who met the trial criteria, entered this double-blind, randomized study. Subjects were assigned to receive either generic citalopram or Cipram® for 8 weeks. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) were utilized to assess depression and anxiety at baseline, weeks 4 and 8 of the study. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 14.0. RESULTS: Twenty patients received citalopram (mean dosages of 22 mg/day during the first 4 weeks and 33 mg/day during weeks 4 to 8) and 20 received Cipram® (mean dosages of 22 mg/day during the first 4 weeks and 29 mg/day during weeks 4 to 8). Both treatments were noted to be effective in improving the symptoms of MADD at weeks 4 and 8. The mean differences of HAM-D and HAM-A between Citalopram and Cipram® groups were significantly different at the end of week 4 (HAM-D: P = 0.038, HAM-A: P = 0.025), but not at the end of week 8 (HAM-D: P = 0.239, HAM-A: P = 0.204). Both medications were tolerated well by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the efficacy of citalopram is similar to that of Cipram® in the treatment of MADD after 8 weeks. Meanwhile, Cipram® may reduce depression and anxiety quicker than its generic, citalopram.
|
Authors | Hasan Khoonsari, Mohammad Bagher Oghazian, Mona Kargar, Mahdiyeh Moin, Hossein Khalili, Abbas Alimadadi, Hassan Torkamandi, Padideh Ghaeli |
Journal | Iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences
(Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci)
Vol. 9
Issue 2
Pg. e230
(Jun 2015)
ISSN: 1735-8639 [Print] Netherlands |
PMID | 26288644
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|