Abstract | INTRODUCTION: METHODS: Relevant trials were identified by searching databases. Five trials were selected in this article. The indicators we used were overall response rate, disease control rate, 1-year survival rate and haematological toxicities. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of the pooled data demonstrated that the overall response rate (risk ratio, RR = 2.52, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.85-3.42, P < 0.00001) and disease control rate (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37, P < 0.0001) were significantly different for the GS and GEM alone chemotherapies. Among the group of patients, 43.4% in the GS group and 31.4% in the GEM group survived more than a year. According to this, patients who use the GS regiment may have a better prognosis than the GEM regiment (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.12-2.33, P = 0.04). The combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 group had higher haematological toxicities including neutropaenia (RR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.17-2.14, P = 0.003) and thrombocytopaenia (RR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.28-2.67, P = 0.001). The incidence of anaemia was much the same in the two groups (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.87-1.70, P = 0.24). DISCUSSION: Overall response rate and disease control rate as well as 1-year survival rate in patients who received GS were superior to those treated with GEM alone. Combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 may offer greater benefits in the treatment of pancreatic cancer than GEM alone, although the GS group had higher haematological toxicities. Combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 might be an option of first-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients, at least in Asia. Mini Abstract: This systematic review analysing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing S-1 combination chemotherapy versus GEM alone for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer demonstrated greater efficacy for S-1 combination in term of response, disease control and 1-year survival proportion.
|
Authors | Yanxun Li, Jinjin Sun, Zhijia Jiang, Linqiang Zhang, Geng Liu |
Journal | Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy)
(J Chemother)
Vol. 27
Issue 4
Pg. 227-34
(Aug 2015)
ISSN: 1973-9478 [Electronic] England |
PMID | 25790948
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Systematic Review)
|
Chemical References |
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Drug Combinations
- Deoxycytidine
- S 1 (combination)
- Tegafur
- Oxonic Acid
- Gemcitabine
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Asia
- Deoxycytidine
(adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
- Drug Combinations
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Oxonic Acid
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
(drug therapy)
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Risk
- Survival Rate
- Tegafur
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Treatment Outcome
- Gemcitabine
|