Neurally adjusted non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does patient-ventilator synchrony matter?

Abstract

Patient-ventilator interaction represents an important clinical challenge during non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Doorduin and colleagues' study shows that non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient-ventilator interaction compared with pressure support ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There is no doubt nowadays that NAVA is the most effective mode of improving the synchrony between patient and machine, but the key question for the clinicians is whether or not this will make a difference to the patient's outcome. The results of the study still do not clarify this issue because of the very low clinically important dyssynchrony, like wasted efforts, in the population studied. Air leaks play an important role in determining patient-ventilator interaction and therefore NIV success or failure. Apart from the use of a dedicated NIV ventilator or specific modes of ventilation like NAVA, the clinicians should be aware that the choice of interface, the humidification system and the appropriate sedation are key factors in improving patient-ventilator synchrony.

• Authors: Stefano Nava, Lara Pisani
• Journal: Critical care (London, England) (Crit Care) Vol. 18 Issue 6 Pg. 670 (Nov 28 2014) ISSN: 1466-609X [Electronic] England
• PMID: 25672776 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Comment)

Topics

• Female
• Humans
• Interactive Ventilatory Support (methods)
• Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation (methods)
• Male
• Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (therapy)