HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of gemcitabine combined with targeted agent therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Targeted therapy has brought great clinical benefits for patients with multiple solid tumors, but its effects in patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (LA/MPC) are disputed. This systematic evaluation compared the efficacy and safety profiles of gemcitabine combined with targeted agents (GEM + TA) versus gemcitabine administered as monotherapy or combined with placebo (GEM ± PLC) in LA/MPC patients.
METHODS:
PubMed and EMBASE were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials published on or before April 30, 2013. The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary end points were 1-year survival rate, objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity rates (TRs), defined as the prevalence of grade 3/4 adverse events. The systematic evaluation was performed by using Review Manager version 5.1.7.
FINDINGS:
A total of 10 randomized controlled trials involving 3899 patients (2195 males; mean age, 63.6 years) were included in the systematic evaluation. The results reported that there was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.97 [P = 0.85]), PFS (HR = 0.95 [P = 0.14]), or ORR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95 [P = 0.69]) between GEM + TA and GEM ± PLC. However, a marginal difference in 1-year survival rate (OR = 0.80 [P = 0.05]) between the 2 groups was observed. The grade 3/4 TRs of anemia, diarrhea, nausea, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and vomiting were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, the prevalence of grade 3/4 rash was significantly greater in the GEM + TA group (OR = 8.31 [P < 0.01]).
IMPLICATIONS:
Based on the results from this analysis, the addition of targeted agents to a regimen of gemcitabine treatment does not bring survival benefits except 1-year survival rate to patients with LA/MPC.
AuthorsQin Li, Zhenyan Yuan, Han Yan, Zhaoyang Wen, Ruixue Zhang, Bangwei Cao
JournalClinical therapeutics (Clin Ther) Vol. 36 Issue 7 Pg. 1054-63 (Jul 01 2014) ISSN: 1879-114X [Electronic] United States
PMID24986485 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Gemcitabine
Topics
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Databases, Bibliographic
  • Deoxycytidine (analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Middle Aged
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms (drug therapy)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Survival Analysis
  • Gemcitabine

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: