Abstract | BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic leg ulcers typically experience contact allergy to topical treatments. Although declared as hypoallergenic, modern wound dressings have caused several reported cases of contact allergy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate any allergenic potential of modern wound dressings in patients with leg ulcers. METHODS: Seventy-one patients were included in our prospective observation. Patch tests were performed with a selection of 10 modern wound dressings and with selected allergens according to series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). RESULTS: Of 70 patients eligible for evaluation, 12 (17%) were positive for the hydrogel NuGel, followed by the hydrocolloid NuDerm (n = 7/70, 10%) and the ionic silver-containing wound dressing Aquacel Ag and the gauze Adaptic (both n = 4/70, 5%). Patients with recalcitrant ulcers of prolonged duration showed a significant higher number of epicutaneous sensitizations to wound dressings than patients with shorter ulcer duration. CONCLUSIONS: The allergenic potential of modern wound dressings should not be underestimated. There is need for precise declaration of all ingredients.
|
Authors | Regina Renner, Jan C Simon, Regina Treudler |
Journal | Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
(Dermatitis)
2013 Mar-Apr
Vol. 24
Issue 2
Pg. 60-3
ISSN: 2162-5220 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 23474445
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Allergens
- Colloids
- Silver Compounds
- Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Allergens
(adverse effects)
- Bandages
(adverse effects)
- Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium
(adverse effects)
- Colloids
(adverse effects)
- Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
(etiology)
- Female
- Humans
- Leg Ulcer
(therapy)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Patch Tests
(methods)
- Prospective Studies
- Silver Compounds
(adverse effects)
- Wound Healing
|