HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Economic outcomes of treatment for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic literature review.

AbstractPURPOSE:
We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ureteral/renal stone treatment by comparing ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
We performed a systematic literature search to identify studies of treatment for adults with ureteral and renal stones that were published between 1995 and 2010. For inclusion in analysis studies had to provide the stone-free rate and the cost of at least 2 therapies.
RESULTS:
Ten studies were identified, including 8 with an observational design and 2 that synthesized data using decision modeling techniques. Five of 6 studies, including 1 of 2 from the United States, compared ureteroscopy vs shock wave lithotripsy for proximal stones and showed a higher stone-free rate and lower cost for ureteroscopy. Four of the 5 studies, including the only American study, compared ureteroscopy vs shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones and also showed such an economically dominant result. Studies of shock wave lithotripsy vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones demonstrated higher cost and a higher stone-free rate for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
CONCLUSIONS:
Despite the great heterogeneity and limited quality of available cost-effectiveness evaluations most studies demonstrated that ureteroscopy was more favorable than shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in stone-free rate and cost.
AuthorsBrian R Matlaga, Jeroen P Jansen, Lisa M Meckley, Thomas W Byrne, James E Lingeman
JournalThe Journal of urology (J Urol) Vol. 188 Issue 2 Pg. 449-54 (Aug 2012) ISSN: 1527-3792 [Electronic] United States
PMID22698623 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, Systematic Review)
CopyrightCopyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kidney Calculi (economics, therapy)
  • Lithotripsy (economics)
  • Male
  • Nephrostomy, Percutaneous (economics)
  • Recurrence
  • United States
  • Ureteral Calculi (economics, therapy)
  • Ureteroscopy (economics)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: