Abstract |
A mouse model has been extensively used to investigate disease intervention approaches and correlates of immunity following influenza virus infection. The majority of studies examining cross-reactive and protective immune responses have used intranasal (IN) virus inoculation; however, infectious aerosols are a common means of transmitting influenza in the human population. In this study, IN and aerosol routes of inoculation were compared and end-points of immunity and disease pathogenesis were evaluated in mice using mouse-adapted H3N2 A/Aichi/2/68 (x31). Aerosol inoculation with sub-lethal x31 levels caused more robust infection, which was characterized by enhanced morbidity, mortality, pulmonary cell infiltration, and inflammation, compared to IN-inoculated mice, as well as higher levels of IL-6 expression in the lung. Treatment with IL-6-blocking antibodies reduced pulmonary infiltrates and lung pathology in aerosol-inoculated mice. This study shows that aerosol inoculation results in a distinctive host response and disease outcome compared to IN inoculation, and suggests a possible role for IL-6 in lung pathogenesis.
|
Authors | Jennifer Humberd Smith, Tamas Nagy, Jamie Barber, Paula Brooks, S Mark Tompkins, Ralph A Tripp |
Journal | Viral immunology
(Viral Immunol)
Vol. 24
Issue 2
Pg. 131-42
(Apr 2011)
ISSN: 1557-8976 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 21449723
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Administration, Inhalation
- Administration, Intranasal
- Aerosols
- Animals
- Female
- Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype
(immunology, pathogenicity)
- Lung
(immunology, pathology)
- Lung Diseases
(immunology, pathology, virology)
- Mice
- Mice, Inbred BALB C
- Orthomyxoviridae Infections
(immunology, pathology, virology)
|