Safety and effectiveness of a 2009 H1N1 vaccine in Beijing.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

After the first monovalent 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccine became available in September 2009, Chinese officials conducted a mass vaccination program in Beijing. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.

METHODS:

During a 5-day period in September 2009, a total of 95,244 children and adults received the PANFLU.1 vaccine (Sinovac Biotech), a monovalent split-virion vaccine of 15 μg of hemagglutinin antigen without adjuvant. We assessed adverse events after immunization through an enhanced passive-surveillance system and through active surveillance, using diary cards and telephone interviews. Active surveillance for neurologic diseases was implemented in hospitals citywide. To assess vaccine effectiveness, we compared the rates of reported laboratory-confirmed cases of 2009 H1N1 virus infection in students who received the vaccine with the rates in those who did not receive the vaccine, starting 2 weeks after the mass vaccination.

RESULTS:

As of December 31, 2009, adverse events were reported by 193 vaccine recipients. Through hospital-based active surveillance, 362 cases of incident neurologic diseases were identified within 10 weeks after the mass vaccination, including 27 cases of the Guillain-Barré syndrome. None of the neurologic conditions occurred among vaccine recipients. From 245 schools, 25,037 students participated in the mass vaccination and 244,091 did not. During the period from October 9 through November 15, 2009, the incidence of confirmed cases of 2009 H1N1 virus infection per 100,000 students was 35.9 (9 of 25,037) among vaccinated students and 281.4 (687 of 244,091) among unvaccinated students. Thus, the estimated vaccine effectiveness was 87.3% (95% confidence interval, 75.4 to 93.4).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among 95,244 children and adults in Beijing, the PANFLU.1 vaccine had a safety profile similar to those of seasonal influenza vaccines and appeared to be effective against confirmed H1N1 virus infection in school-age children. (Funded by the Beijing Municipal Health Bureau.).

• Authors: Jiang Wu, Fujie Xu, Li Lu, Min Lu, Liang Miao, Ting Gao, Wenyan Ji, Luodan Suo, Donglei Liu, Rui Ma, Rui Yu, Jiazi Zhangzhu, Weixiang Liu, Yang Zeng, Xiaomei Li, Xuechun Zhang, Xinghuo Pang, Ying Deng
• Journal: The New England journal of medicine (N Engl J Med) Vol. 363 Issue 25 Pg. 2416-23 (Dec 16 2010) ISSN: 1533-4406 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 21158658 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)

Chemical References

• Influenza Vaccines

Topics

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Child
• Child, Preschool
• China (epidemiology)
• Disease Outbreaks (prevention & control)
• Guillain-Barre Syndrome (epidemiology)
• Humans
• Incidence
• Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype
• Influenza Vaccines (adverse effects, immunology)
• Influenza, Human (epidemiology, prevention & control)
• Mass Vaccination
• Middle Aged
• Nervous System Diseases (epidemiology)
• Population Surveillance
• Risk
• Treatment Outcome
• Young Adult