HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Early tracheotomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in unselected severely ill ICU patients.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
Although several advantages are attributed to tracheotomy in ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), true benefits and the optimal timing of tracheotomy remain controversial. In this study, we compared early tracheotomy (ET) with prolonged intubation (PI) in severely ill patients requiring prolonged MV.
DESIGN:
Prospective, randomized study.
SETTING:
Twenty-five medical and surgical ICUs in France.
PATIENTS:
Patients expected to require MV > 7 days.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS:
Patients were randomised to either (open or percutaneous) ET within 4 days or PI. The primary end-point was 28-day mortality. Secondary end-points were: the incidence of ICU-acquired pneumonia, number of d1-d28 ventilator-free days, time spent in the ICU, 60-day mortality, number of septic episodes, amount of sedation, comfort and laryngeal and tracheal complications. A sample size of 470 patients was considered necessary to obtain a reduction from 45 to 32% in 28-day mortality. After 30 months, 123 patients had been included (ET = 61, PI = 62) in 25 centres and the study was prematurely closed. All group characteristics were similar upon admission to ICU. No difference was found between the two groups for any of the primary or secondary end-points. Greater comfort was the sole benefit afforded by tracheotomy after subjective self-assessment by patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
The trial did not demonstrate any major benefit of tracheotomy in a general population of ICU patients, as suggested in a previous meta-analysis, but was underpowered to draw any firm conclusions. The potential advantage of ET may be restricted to selected groups of patients.
AuthorsFrançois Blot, Thomas Similowski, Jean-Louis Trouillet, Patrick Chardon, Jean-Michel Korach, Marie-Alyette Costa, Didier Journois, Guillaume Thiéry, Muriel Fartoukh, Isabelle Pipien, Nicolas Bruder, David Orlikowski, Frédéric Tankere, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Christian Auboyer, Gérard Nitenberg, Laurent Holzapfel, Alain Tenaillon, Jean Chastre, Agnès Laplanche
JournalIntensive care medicine (Intensive Care Med) Vol. 34 Issue 10 Pg. 1779-87 (Oct 2008) ISSN: 0342-4642 [Print] United States
PMID18592210 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cross Infection (etiology, prevention & control)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Intubation, Intratracheal (adverse effects)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pneumonia (etiology, prevention & control)
  • Respiration, Artificial (adverse effects, methods)
  • Survival Analysis
  • Tracheostomy (adverse effects)
  • Ventilator Weaning
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: