Abstract | PURPOSE: METHODS: One thousand multiple-choice surveys were distributed via e-mail in the US and EU. RESULTS: The authors received 71 responses (US 40 [8%] and EU 31 [6%]). Physicians preferred prostaglandin monotherapy (US 39 [98%] and EU 22 [71%], p=0.003), usually latanoprost (US 32 [80%] and EU 22 [71%], p=0.45). When more efficacy was required, US physicians would typically switch (23 [58%]) and EU physicians would add therapy (22 [71%], p=0.007). In both continents 45% of respondents stated bimatoprost was more efficacious. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | W C Stewart, J A Stewart, L A Nelson, B Kruft |
Journal | European journal of ophthalmology
(Eur J Ophthalmol)
2008 Mar-Apr
Vol. 18
Issue 2
Pg. 199-204
ISSN: 1120-6721 [Print] United States |
PMID | 18320511
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Amides
- Antihypertensive Agents
- Prostaglandins F, Synthetic
- Cloprostenol
- Latanoprost
- Bimatoprost
- Travoprost
|
Topics |
- Amides
(therapeutic use)
- Antihypertensive Agents
(therapeutic use)
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Bimatoprost
- Cloprostenol
(analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
- Europe
- Glaucoma
(drug therapy)
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Health Services Research
- Health Surveys
- Humans
- Latanoprost
- Ophthalmology
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Prostaglandins F, Synthetic
(therapeutic use)
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Travoprost
- United States
|