Abstract |
Two versions of conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis, fluorescent (F-CSGE) and manual (M-CSGE) techniques, were compared for mutation analysis of the von Willebrand factor gene. 56 PCRs were used to amplify all 52 exons of the gene in seven type 1 von Willebrand disease cases, plus a healthy control. One hundred and ninety-two samples were analyzed on each F-CSGE gel, compared with 40 on M-CSGE. 125 amplicons revealed bandshifts using F-CSGE, but only 101 by M-CSGE. Five mutations were detected by both techniques. F-CSGE detected 45 different polymorphisms whereas M-CSGE detected only 39. F-CSGE is high-throughput and more sensitive than M-CSGE.
|
Authors | Mohammad Hashemi Soteh, Ian R Peake, Luke Marsden, John Anson, Javier Batlle, Dominique Meyer, Edith Fressinaud, Claudine Mazurier, Jenny Goudemand, Jeroen Eikenboom, Anne Goodeve, MCMDM-1VWD Study Group |
Journal | Haematologica
(Haematologica)
Vol. 92
Issue 4
Pg. 550-3
(Apr 2007)
ISSN: 1592-8721 [Electronic] Italy |
PMID | 17488667
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Fluorescent Dyes
- von Willebrand Factor
- DNA
|
Topics |
- DNA
(blood, chemistry, genetics)
- DNA Mutational Analysis
(methods)
- Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel
(methods)
- Exons
(genetics)
- Fluorescent Dyes
(analysis)
- Fluorometry
- Heteroduplex Analysis
(methods)
- Humans
- Nucleic Acid Conformation
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Pseudogenes
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- von Willebrand Diseases
(genetics)
- von Willebrand Factor
(chemistry, genetics)
|