HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Less toxicity by optimizing chemotherapy, but not by addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia: results of AML-BFM 98.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To improve prognosis in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by randomized comparisons of (1) two short consolidation cycles versus the Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM) -type biphasic 6-week consolidation and (2) the prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus no G-CSF. Further, therapy for standard risk patients was intensified by addition of a second induction, HAM (high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone).
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Four hundred seventy-three patients younger than 18 years with de novo AML were enrolled in trial AML-BFM 98. Patients received five courses of intensive chemotherapy, cranial irradiation, and 1-year maintenance therapy.
RESULTS:
Four hundred eighteen patients (88%) achieved remission. Compared with trial AML-BFM 93, early deaths decreased from 7.4 to 3.2% (P = .005), and 5-year overall survival increased from 58% to 62% (log-rank P = .03). Both types of consolidation therapy led to similar outcome (event-free survival, 51% v 50%), but in the two-cycle arm, treatment duration was shorter (median duration, 15 days), and treatment related mortality was lower (five v nine patients). G-CSF shortened neutropenia, but did not reduce the rate of severe infections. Intensification of induction therapy did not improve prognosis of standard-risk patients (event-free survival, 62% v 67%).
CONCLUSION:
Overall results were improved by neither the administration of G-CSF nor by cycle therapy; however, the latter was easier to perform. Compared with study AML-BFM 93, therapy intensification with HAM in standard-risk patients did not result in improved prognosis. Future treatment designs have to balance intensification of treatment with higher toxicity, improve supportive care, and to consider alternative treatment strategies.
AuthorsUrsula Creutzig, Martin Zimmermann, Thomas Lehrnbecher, Norbert Graf, Johann Hermann, Charlotte M Niemeyer, Alfred Reiter, Jörg Ritter, Michael Dworzak, Jan Stary, Dirk Reinhardt
JournalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol) Vol. 24 Issue 27 Pg. 4499-506 (Sep 20 2006) ISSN: 1527-7755 [Electronic] United States
PMID16983120 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Cytarabine
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Mitoxantrone
  • Idarubicin
  • Daunorubicin
Topics
  • Acute Disease
  • Adolescent
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cranial Irradiation
  • Cytarabine (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Daunorubicin (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Idarubicin (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Infant
  • Infections (etiology)
  • Leukemia, Myeloid (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Male
  • Mitoxantrone (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Neutropenia (chemically induced, prevention & control)
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: