We evaluated positon emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in 120 patients with intestinal
malignancies, focusing on its diagnostic yield and influence on the surgical strategy. PET had a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 100% for
metastases in 28 patients with cardio-esophageal
carcinoma. PET detected 64% of 22 primary
pancreatic carcinomas, and had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 83% for
metastases. In two cases, PET showed false-positive signs of peritoneal
metastasis (not found at
laparotomy). Among 70 patients with recurrent or metastatic
colorectal carcinoma, eight had signs of local recurrence of rectal
carcinoma treated by
abdominoperineal resection; PET gave four true-positive, one false-negative, and three false-positive results. PET was better than computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of peritoneal
metastasis, but its sensitivity was only 58%. The diagnostic value of PET for hepatic
metastases (87%) was similar to that of
CT (77%) and sonography (87%). The diagnostic sensitivity of PET for pulmonary
metastases (82%) was similar to that of CT (84%). PET modified the surgical strategy in two (7%) of 28 patients with cardio-esophageal
carcinoma, one (5%) of 22 patients with
pancreatic carcinoma, and 22 (33%) of 70 patients with
colorectal carcinoma (appropriately in 11 cases, inappropriately in 11 cases). These disappointing results suggest that PET must be thoroughly evaluated in this setting before being widely adopted.