The risk of local infective complications after damage control procedures for femoral shaft fracture.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To determine infection rates after damage control orthopaedics (DCO) and primary intramedullary nailing (1' IMN) in multiply injured patients with femoral shaft fracture.

DESIGN:

Retrospective case analysis.

SETTING:

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS:

All patients with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) >20 and femoral shaft fracture (AO 32-) treated in our unit between 1996 and 2002.

INTERVENTION:

Damage control orthopaedics, defined as primary external fixation of the femoral shaft fracture and subsequent conversion to an intramedullary nail, or primary IMN.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:

Rates of infection classified as contamination (positive swabs with no clinical change), superficial, deep (requiring surgery), and removal of hardware (those requiring removal of femoral instrumentation or amputation).

RESULTS:

A total of 173 patients with 192 fractures were included; 111 fractures were treated by DCO and 81 by primary IMN. Mean follow-up was 19.1 months [median, 16.7, range, 1 (patient died)-67 months]. DCO patients had a significantly higher NISS and more grade III open fractures (P<0.001). IMN procedures took a median of 150 minutes compared with 85 minutes for DCO (P<0.0001). Although wound contamination (including contaminated pin sites) was more common in the DCO group (P<0.05), the risk of infectious complications was equivalent (P=0.86). Contamination was significantly more likely when conversion to IMN occurred after more than 14 days (P<0.05); however, this did not lead to more clinically relevant infections. Logistic regression analysis showed that although a DCO approach was not associated with infection, delay before conversion in the DCO group might be [P=0.002 for contamination and removal of hardware, P=0.065 for serious infection (deep or worse), not significant for other infection outcomes]. Grade III open injury also was significantly associated with serious infection in all patients (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Infection rates after DCO for femoral fractures are comparable to those after primary IMN. We see no contraindication to the implementation of a damage control approach for severely injured patients with femoral shaft fracture where appropriate. Pin-site contamination was more common where the fixator was in place for more than 2 weeks. For patients treated by using a DCO approach, conversion to definitive fixation should be performed in a timely fashion.

• Authors: Paul J Harwood, Peter V Giannoudis, Christian Probst, Christian Krettek, Hans-Christoph Pape
• Journal: Journal of orthopaedic trauma (J Orthop Trauma) Vol. 20 Issue 3 Pg. 181-9 (Mar 2006) ISSN: 0890-5339 [Print] United States
• PMID: 16648699 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)

Topics

• Adult
• External Fixators
• Female
• Femoral Fractures (surgery)
• Fracture Fixation (methods)
• Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
• Humans
• Injury Severity Score
• Logistic Models
• Male
• Multiple Trauma
• Postoperative Complications (epidemiology)
• Retrospective Studies