HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A randomized trial of diagnostic strategies after normal proximal vein ultrasonography for suspected deep venous thrombosis: D-dimer testing compared with repeated ultrasonography.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
With suspected deep venous thrombosis and normal results on proximal vein ultrasonography, a negative d-dimer result may exclude thrombosis and a positive D-dimer result may be an indication for venography.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate and compare the safety of 2 diagnostic strategies for deep venous thrombosis.
DESIGN:
Randomized, multicenter trial.
SETTING:
Four university hospitals.
PATIENTS:
810 outpatients with suspected deep venous thrombosis and negative results on proximal vein ultrasonography.
INTERVENTIONS:
Erythrocyte agglutination D-dimer testing followed by no further testing if the result was negative and venography if the result was positive (experimental) or ultrasonography repeated after 1 week in all patients (control).
MEASUREMENTS:
Symptomatic deep venous thrombosis diagnosed initially and symptomatic venous thromboembolism during 6 months of follow-up.
RESULTS:
Nineteen of 408 patients (4.7%) in the D-dimer group and 3 of 402 patients (0.7%) in the repeated ultrasonography group initially received a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (P < 0.001). During follow-up of patients without a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis on initial testing, 8 patients (2.1% [95% CI, 0.9% to 4.0%]) in the D-dimer group and 5 patients (1.3% [CI, 0.4% to 2.9%]) in the repeated ultrasonography group developed symptomatic venous thromboembolism (difference, 0.8 percentage point [CI, -1.1 to 2.9 percentage points]; P > 0.2). Venous thromboembolism occurred in 1.0% (CI, 0.2% to 2.8%) of those with a negative D-dimer result.
LIMITATIONS:
Seventy patients (8.6%) deviated from the diagnostic protocols, and 9 patients (1.1%) had inadequate follow-up.
CONCLUSION:
In outpatients with suspected deep venous thrombosis who initially had normal results on ultrasonography of the proximal veins, a strategy based on D-dimer testing followed by no further testing if the result was negative and venography if the result was positive had acceptable safety and did not differ from the safety of a strategy based on withholding anticoagulant therapy and routinely repeating ultrasonography after 1 week.
AuthorsClive Kearon, Jeffrey S Ginsberg, James Douketis, Mark A Crowther, Alexander G Turpie, Shannon M Bates, Agnes Lee, Patrick Brill-Edwards, Terri Finch, Michael Gent
JournalAnnals of internal medicine (Ann Intern Med) Vol. 142 Issue 7 Pg. 490-6 (Apr 05 2005) ISSN: 1539-3704 [Electronic] United States
PMID15809460 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products
Topics
  • Female
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products (analysis)
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Leg (blood supply)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler
  • Veins (diagnostic imaging)
  • Venous Thrombosis (diagnosis, diagnostic imaging)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: