The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of different inhaled
perfluorocarbons (PFC) upon pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange in a saline lavage model of
acute lung injury. A randomized, controlled animal trial was conducted at the university hospital laboratory. Pulmonary gas exchange (
pGE), static compliance (Cst), and basic hemodynamics (heart rate [HR], arterial [AP] and central venous pressures [CVP]) were compared. After induction of
lung injury by repeated pulmonary lavage with
saline solution, 35 New Zealand rabbits (3 +/- 0.2 kg) were randomized into five groups with seven animals each: 1) conventional ventilated control, 2)
perfluorooctane (
octane), 3)
Perflubron (
perfluorooctylbromide [
PFOB]), 4) Perfluoro-1,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane (PP 4), and 5)
perfluorohexane (
hexane). Consecutively, PFC groups were subjected to a 120 minute study period applying
mechanical ventilation (tidal volume of 7 ml/kg) in conjunction with PFC performed by a modified
halothane vaporizer. Amount of vaporization was controlled by weighing the
vaporizer at approximately 25 ml/h/kg
body-weight PFC. Controls remained gas ventilated. After injury, PaO2 was control = 53 +/- 13 mbar,
octane = 55 +/- 24 mbar,
perflubron = 57 +/- 18 mbar, PP4 = 68 +/- 25 mbar, and
hexane = 51 +/- 16 mbar. Within the 120 minute period, PaO2 was control = 51 +/- 19 mbar,
octane = 42 +/- 6 mbar,
perflubron = 40 +/- 11 mbar, PP4 = 47 +/- 10 mbar, and
hexane = 60 +/- 8 mbar, respectively. At baseline, after injury, and throughout the study period,
pGE and Cst, as well as HR, AP, and CVP, did not significantly differ when compared with
octane, PP4,
PFOB, and controls (p > 0.05), whereas
hexane significantly improved
pGE and Cst (p < 0.05). From four different inhaled
perfluorocarbons, only
perfluorohexane has measureable impact upon gas exchange and lung mechanics when compared with a conventional lung protective ventilation mode.