HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and safety of willow bark extract in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: results of 2 randomized double-blind controlled trials.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To investigate the efficacy and safety of a standardized willow bark extract in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS:
We studied 127 outpatients with hip or knee OA and a WOMAC pain score of at least 30 mm and 26 outpatients with active RA in 2 randomized, controlled, double-blind trials with followup for 6 weeks. OA trial: Patients were randomized to receive willow bark extract, corresponding to 240 mg of salicin/day, diclofenac 100 mg/day, or placebo (n = 43, 43, and 41, respectively). Main outcome measure was the pain subscore of the WOMAC OA Index. RA trial: Patients were randomized to receive willow bark extract, corresponding to 240 mg salicin/day (n = 13) or placebo (n = 13). Main outcome measure was the patient's assessment of pain rated on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS:
OA trial: WOMAC pain scores decreased by 8 mm (17%) in the willow bark group and by 23 mm (47%) in the diclofenac group, compared with 5 mm (10%) in the placebo group. The difference between willow bark extract and placebo was not statistically significant (-2.8 mm; 95% CI -12.1 to 6.4 mm; p = 0.55, ANCOVA), but the difference between diclofenac and placebo was highly significant (-18.0 mm; 95% CI -27.2 to -8.8 mm; p = 0.0002, ANCOVA). RA trial: The mean reduction of pain on the VAS was -8 mm (15%) in the willow bark group compared with -2 mm (4%) in the placebo group. The difference was not statistically significant (estimated difference -0.8 mm; 95% CI -20.9 to 19.3 mm; p = 0.93, ANCOVA).
CONCLUSION:
The OA study suggested that the willow bark extract showed no relevant efficacy in patients with OA. Similarly, the RA trial did not indicate efficacy of this extract in patients with RA.
AuthorsClaudia Biegert, Irmela Wagner, Rainer Lüdtke, Ina Kötter, Claudia Lohmüller, Ilhan Günaydin, Katja Taxis, Lutz Heide
JournalThe Journal of rheumatology (J Rheumatol) Vol. 31 Issue 11 Pg. 2121-30 (Nov 2004) ISSN: 0315-162X [Print] Canada
PMID15517622 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Plant Extracts
  • Diclofenac
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal (therapeutic use)
  • Antirheumatic Agents (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Diclofenac (therapeutic use)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Health Status
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Plant Bark (chemistry)
  • Plant Extracts (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Salix (chemistry)
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: