Abstract | PURPOSE: METHODS: We systematically searched the literature up to August 2002 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials of lipid-lowering interventions that reported nonfatal and fatal stroke and mortality data. The search yielded 65 trials with 200,607 patients for a meta-analysis to determine whether treatment effects differed between types of lipid-lowering interventions and between patient samples with and without coronary heart disease. RESULTS: The risk ratio for nonfatal and fatal stroke for statins as compared with control interventions was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 0.90). The corresponding risk ratios for statins as compared with control were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.87) for patients with coronary heart disease and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.95) for those without coronary heart disease. The confidence intervals of risk ratios for nonfatal and fatal stroke associated with fibrates, resins, n-3 fatty acids, and diet all included 1, as did the confidence intervals for these interventions in patients with and without coronary heart disease. Weighted meta-regression analysis suggested a stronger association of stroke reduction with statin treatment than with the extent of cholesterol reduction. CONCLUSION:
|
Authors | Matthias Briel, Marco Studer, Tracy R Glass, Heiner C Bucher |
Journal | The American journal of medicine
(Am J Med)
Vol. 117
Issue 8
Pg. 596-606
(Oct 15 2004)
ISSN: 0002-9343 [Print] United States |
PMID | 15465509
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review)
|
Chemical References |
- Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
- Hypolipidemic Agents
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Confidence Intervals
- Coronary Disease
(complications)
- Female
- Humans
- Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
(therapeutic use)
- Hypolipidemic Agents
(therapeutic use)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Stroke
(complications, mortality, prevention & control)
|