HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Chemohormonal therapy as primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer: a randomized study of estramustine phosphate plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist versus flutamide plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The present study was undertaken mainly to investigate whether chemohormonal therapy with estramustine phosphate plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist has a more beneficial effect than the hormonal therapy with flutamide plus LHRH agonist for newly diagnosed patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
METHODS:
A total of 57 patients with metastatic prostate cancer aged 59-80 years (median 74 years) were entered in the study and were randomized to the treatment of estramustine phosphate (560 mg/day) plus LHRH agonist (estramustine group) or flutamide (375 mg/day) plus LHRH agonist (flutamide group) with stratification for the degree of performance status, histological differentiation and bone metastasis.
RESULTS:
Both of the treatment regimens were well tolerated with similar incidences of adverse drug reactions. The overall response rates (complete response plus partial response) at 12 weeks after treatment in the estramustine and flutamide groups were 76 and 55%, respectively. The median time to objective progression for the estramustine group (25.4 months) was longer than that of the flutamide group (14.6 months). The serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone and testosterone were significantly lower in the estramustine group.
CONCLUSIONS:
Chemohormonal therapy with estramustine phosphate plus LHRH agonist showed longer clinical progression-free survival than the hormonal therapy with flutamide plus LHRH agonist (P = 0.03), although there was no significant difference in the overall survival. A larger-scaled trial with more statistical power is required to clarify that the former regimen is more beneficial than the latter for newly diagnosed patients with advanced prostate cancer.
AuthorsMasanori Noguchi, Shinshi Noda, Masaki Yoshida, Shoichi Ueda, Taizo Shiraishi, Kyogo Itoh, Kurume-Kumamoto Estracyt Study Group
JournalInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association (Int J Urol) Vol. 11 Issue 2 Pg. 103-9 (Feb 2004) ISSN: 0919-8172 [Print] Australia
PMID14706014 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone
  • Estramustine
  • Flutamide
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Androgen Antagonists (administration & dosage)
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal (administration & dosage)
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Estramustine (administration & dosage)
  • Flutamide (administration & dosage)
  • Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (antagonists & inhibitors)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness (pathology)
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Probability
  • Prognosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: