HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Salmeterol powder provides significantly better benefit than montelukast in asthmatic patients receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

AbstractSTUDY OBJECTIVES:
Comparison of inhaled salmeterol powder vs oral montelukast treatment in patients with persistent asthma who remained symptomatic while receiving inhaled corticosteroids.
DESIGN:
Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter trials of 12-week duration.
SETTING:
Outpatients in private and university-affiliated clinics.
PATIENTS:
Male and female patients > or = 15 years of age with a diagnosis of asthma (baseline FEV(1) of 50 to 80% of predicted) and symptomatic despite receiving inhaled corticosteroids.
INTERVENTIONS:
Inhaled salmeterol xinafoate powder, 50 microg bid, or oral montelukast, 10 mg qd.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS:
Treatment with salmeterol powder resulted in significantly greater improvements from baseline compared with montelukast for most efficacy measurements, including morning peak expiratory flow (35.0 L/min vs 21.7 L/min; p < 0.001), percentage of symptom-free days (24% vs 16%; p < 0.001), and the percentage of rescue-free days (27% vs 20%; p = 0.002). Total supplemental albuterol use was decreased significantly more in the salmeterol group compared with the montelukast group (- 1.90 puffs per day vs - 1.66 puffs per day; p = 0.004) and nighttime awakenings per week decreased significantly more with salmeterol than with montelukast (- 1.42 vs - 1.32; p = 0.015). Patients treated with inhaled salmeterol were significantly more satisfied with their treatment regimen and how well, how fast, and how long it worked than were patients who were treated with oral montelukast. The safety profiles for the two treatments were similar.
CONCLUSION:
In patients with persistent asthma who remain symptomatic while receiving inhaled corticosteroids, adding inhaled salmeterol powder provided significantly greater improvement in lung function and asthma symptoms and was preferred by patients over oral montelukast.
AuthorsJ E Fish, E Israel, J J Murray, A Emmett, R Boone, S W Yancey, K A Rickard
JournalChest (Chest) Vol. 120 Issue 2 Pg. 423-30 (Aug 2001) ISSN: 0012-3692 [Print] United States
PMID11502639 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Acetates
  • Adrenal Cortex Hormones
  • Adrenergic beta-Agonists
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents
  • Bronchodilator Agents
  • Cyclopropanes
  • Powders
  • Quinolines
  • Sulfides
  • Salmeterol Xinafoate
  • montelukast
  • Albuterol
Topics
  • Acetates (administration & dosage)
  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Adolescent
  • Adrenal Cortex Hormones (administration & dosage)
  • Adrenergic beta-Agonists (administration & dosage)
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Albuterol (administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives)
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Asthma (drug therapy)
  • Bronchodilator Agents (administration & dosage)
  • Cyclopropanes
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Powders
  • Quinolines (administration & dosage)
  • Salmeterol Xinafoate
  • Sulfides

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: