The efficacy and safety of
streptokinase and
heparin in
deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were compared in a meta-analysis. Randomized trials in which
streptokinase (followed by
heparin) and
heparin alone were compared in treating phlebographically documented acute DVT were identified from MEDLINE and other sources for a meta-analysis. Odds ratios (
ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on the logit method were computed for each study. A fixed-effect model was used to combine the study results, enabling differences between
streptokinase recipients and recipients of
heparin alone to be expressed as summary
ORs with 95% CIs. Significantly more
streptokinase recipients achieved thrombolysis than recipients of
heparin alone (summary OR, 6.24; 95% CI, 3.62 to 10.78). One study was identified as an outlier and excluded from the analysis. The meta-analysis then showed that
streptokinase recipients were significantly less likely to have postthrombotic changes (summary OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.88) and postphlebitic changes (summary OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86) in phlebographic evaluation. The frequency of major
bleeding was significantly higher among
streptokinase recipients than recipients of
heparin alone (summary OR, 3.78; 95% CI, 1.26 to 11.32). A meta-analysis showed that, compared with
heparin alone,
streptokinase therapy for DVT was associated with significantly more frequent thrombolysis and major
bleeding; after exclusion of one outlying study, analysis showed that
streptokinase therapy was associated less frequently than
heparin alone with postthrombotic changes (assessed by phlebographic evaluation) and
postphlebitic syndrome.