Abstract |
One hundred twenty-two consecutive patients who had hepato-iminodiacetic acid ( HIDA) scans over a 5-month period were reviewed. These scans were found to have 94% sensitivity, but only 36% specificity for correctly diagnosing pathological variants of cholecystitis. Frequently, HIDA scans were misinterpreted to show common bile duct obstruction (CBDO); only 20% of cases of CBDO suggested on HIDA could be confirmed surgically. Sonography gave 88% to 90% sensitivity and 91% specificity in correctly diagnosing pathological variants of cholecystitis and correctly demonstrated CBDO in 80% of the cases. As first-line studies to evaluate biliary tract disease, HIDA scans are costly and should be eliminated.
|
Authors | H Johnson Jr, B Cooper |
Journal | Journal of the National Medical Association
(J Natl Med Assoc)
Vol. 87
Issue 1
Pg. 27-32
(Jan 1995)
ISSN: 0027-9684 [Print] United States |
PMID | 7869403
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Contrast Media
- Imino Acids
- lidofenin
|
Topics |
- Acute Disease
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Cholecystitis
(diagnostic imaging)
- Chronic Disease
- Contrast Media
- Humans
- Imino Acids
- Middle Aged
- Radionuclide Imaging
- Retrospective Studies
- Sensitivity and Specificity
|