Abstract | AIM: METHODS: This study included patients with endometrial cancer deemed to be at low risk of recurrence and who underwent surgery between January 2011 and December 2020. We studied 99 patients who underwent robot surgery, 85 patients who underwent laparotomy, and 77 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared retrospectively for these groups of patients. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 47, 61, and 60 months in the laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic groups, respectively. The three groups had similar perioperative and pathological data. No significant differences in overall survival and disease-free survival were observed among the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses conducted on the overall study population for disease-free survival and overall survival showed that the surgical approach did not have any influence. Minimally invasive surgery groups had longer operating times compared to the laparotomy group, but they had significantly less blood loss. The number of resected pelvic lymph nodes was similar, and the complication rate was not significant. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Shigehiro Hayashi, Zenta Yamanaka, Junya Kojima, Masataka Ono, Toru Sasaki, Akiko Yamamoto, Masanori Ono, Masayuki Futagami, Hirotaka Nishi |
Journal | The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
(J Obstet Gynaecol Res)
Vol. 50
Issue 1
Pg. 103-112
(Jan 2024)
ISSN: 1447-0756 [Electronic] Australia |
PMID | 37848280
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Copyright | © 2023 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. |
Topics |
- Female
- Humans
- Endometrial Neoplasms
(pathology, surgery)
- Hysterectomy
- Laparoscopy
(adverse effects)
- Laparotomy
(adverse effects)
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
(pathology)
- Neoplasm Staging
- Postoperative Complications
(epidemiology)
- Retrospective Studies
- Robotic Surgical Procedures
(adverse effects)
|