HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Non-opioid analgesics for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Chronic postsurgical pain is common after surgery. Identification of non-opioid analgesics with potential for preventing chronic postsurgical pain is important, although trials are often underpowered. Network meta-analysis offers an opportunity to improve power and to identify the most promising therapy for clinical use and future studies.
METHODS:
We conducted a PRISMA-NMA-compliant systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of non-opioid analgesics for chronic postsurgical pain. Outcomes included incidence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain, serious adverse events, and chronic opioid use.
RESULTS:
We included 132 randomised controlled trials with 23 902 participants. In order of efficacy, i.v. lidocaine (odds ratio [OR] 0.32; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.17-0.58), ketamine (OR 0.64; 95% CrI 0.44-0.92), gabapentinoids (OR 0.67; 95% CrI 0.47-0.92), and possibly dexmedetomidine (OR 0.36; 95% CrI 0.12-1.00) reduced the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain at ≤6 months. There was little available evidence for chronic postsurgical pain at >6 months, combinations agents, chronic opioid use, and serious adverse events. Variable baseline risk was identified as a potential violation to the network meta-analysis transitivity assumption, so results are reported from a fixed value of this, with analgesics more effective at higher baseline risk. The confidence in these findings was low because of problems with risk of bias and imprecision.
CONCLUSIONS:
Lidocaine (most effective), ketamine, and gabapentinoids could be effective in reducing chronic postsurgical pain ≤6 months although confidence is low. Moreover, variable baseline risk might violate transitivity in network meta-analysis of analgesics; this recommends use of our methods in future network meta-analyses.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL:
PROSPERO CRD42021269642.
AuthorsBrett Doleman, Ole Mathiesen, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Jon N Lund, John P Williams
JournalBritish journal of anaesthesia (Br J Anaesth) Vol. 130 Issue 6 Pg. 719-728 (06 2023) ISSN: 1471-6771 [Electronic] England
PMID37059625 (Publication Type: Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review, Journal Article, Review)
CopyrightCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
  • Ketamine
  • Analgesics
  • Lidocaine
  • Analgesics, Opioid
Topics
  • Humans
  • Analgesics, Non-Narcotic (therapeutic use)
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Ketamine (therapeutic use)
  • Analgesics (therapeutic use)
  • Pain, Postoperative (drug therapy, prevention & control)
  • Lidocaine (therapeutic use)
  • Analgesics, Opioid (adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: