Abstract | PURPOSE: METHOD: We performed a systematic review of speech and language therapies for acquired dysgraphia in studies of neurological diseases (PROSPERO: CRD42018084221), following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist with a search on several databases for articles written in English and published until August 31, 2021. Only methodological well-designed studies were included. Further assessment of methodological quality was conducted by means of a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. RESULTS: Eleven studies of 43 patients in total were included. For each study, we collected data on type of population, type of impairment, experimental design, type of treatment, and measured outcomes. The studies had a medium level of assessed methodological quality. An informative description of treatments and linkages to deficits is reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a need for further experimental evidence, most treatments showed good applicability and improvement of written skills in patients with dysgraphia. Lexical treatments appear to be more frequently adopted and more flexible in improving dysgraphia and communication, especially when a multimodal approach is used. Finally, the reported description of treatment modalities for dysgraphia in relation to patients' deficits may be important for providing tailored therapies in clinical management.
|
Authors | Federica Biddau, Camilla Brisotto, Tiziano Innocenti, Sara Ranaldi, Francesca Meneghello, Daniela D'Imperio, Sara Nordio |
Journal | American journal of speech-language pathology
(Am J Speech Lang Pathol)
Vol. 32
Issue 2
Pg. 762-785
(03 09 2023)
ISSN: 1558-9110 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 36857041
(Publication Type: Systematic Review, Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Humans
- Agraphia
(diagnosis, etiology, therapy)
- Speech
- Language Therapy
- Language Disorders
(diagnosis, etiology, therapy)
- Language
|