Abstract | INTRODUCTION: METHODS: We have searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through August 2019 and included randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of adjuvant lomustine for recurrent glioblastoma. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with the control group for recurrent glioblastoma, adjuvant lomustine has no substantial effect on objective response (risk ratio [RR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.93; P = 0.15), complete response (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.26-11.90; P = 0.56), progressive response (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.88-1.99; P = 0.18), median progression-free survival (standard mean difference [SMD], 0.73; 95% CI, -0.65 to 2.11; P = 0.30), or median overall survival (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, -0.30-0.83; P = 0.36), but results in the increase in 6-month progression-free survival (SMD, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.38-3.04; P = 0.01). There is no increase in grade ≥3 adverse events after adjuvant lomustine treatment (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.84-2.89; P = 0.16) compared with control intervention. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Xiaojuan Fu, Dijian Shi, Yimo Feng |
Journal | Clinical neuropharmacology
(Clin Neuropharmacol)
2022 Nov-Dec 01
Vol. 45
Issue 6
Pg. 162-167
ISSN: 1537-162X [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 36383914
(Publication Type: Meta-Analysis, Journal Article)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Humans
- Brain Neoplasms
(drug therapy)
- Glioblastoma
(drug therapy)
- Lomustine
(adverse effects)
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
(drug therapy)
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Treatment Outcome
|