To compare the kinematic characteristics of hindfoot joints in stage II adult acquired
flatfoot deformity (AAFD) with those of non-
flatfoot through the 3D-to-2D registration technology and single fluoroscopic imaging system.
METHODS: Eight volunteers with stage II AAFD and seven volunteers without stage II AAFD were recruited and CT scans were performed bilateral for both groups in neutral positions. Their lateral dynamic X-ray data during the stance phase, including 14 non-
flatfeet and 10
flatfeet, was collected. A computer-aided simulated light source for 3D CT model was applied to obtain the virtual images, which were matched with the dynamic X-ray images to register in the "Fluo" software, so that the spatial changes during the stance phase could be calculated.
RESULTS: During the early-stance phase, the calcaneous was more dorsiflexed, everted, and externally-rotated relative to the talus in
flatfoot compared with that in non-
flatfoot (p < 0.05). During the mid-stance phase, the calcaneous was more dorsiflexed and everted relative to the talus in
flatfoot compared with that in non-
flatfoot (p < 0.05); however, the rotation did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05). During the late-stance phase, the calcaneous was more plantarflexed, but less inverted and internally-rotated, relative to the talus in
flatfoot compared with that in non-
flatfoot (p < 0.05). During the early- and mid-stance phase, the navicular was more dorsiflexed, everted, and externally-rotated relative to the talus in
flatfoot compared with that in non-
flatfoot (p < 0.05). During the late-stance phase, the navicular was more plantarflexed, but less inverted and internally-rotated, relative to the talus in
flatfoot compared with that in non-
flatfoot (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the motion of cuboid between the two groups during the whole stance phase (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: During the early- and mid-stance phase, excessive motion was observed in the subtalar and talonavicular joints in stage II AAFD. During the late-stance phase, the motion of subtalar and talonavicular joints appeared to be in the dysfunction state. The current study helps better understanding the biomechanics of the hindfoot during non-
flatfoot and
flatfoot condition which is critical to the intervention to the AAFD using
conservative treatment such as insole or surgical treatment for joint hypermotion.