Observed efficacy and clinically important improvements in participants with osteoarthritis treated with subcutaneous tanezumab: results from a 56-week randomized NSAID-controlled study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

A recent phase 3 study demonstrated that treatment with tanezumab, a nerve growth factor inhibitor, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) improves pain and physical function in participants with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. Here, we evaluated the time course and clinical importance of these initial efficacy findings using a mixture of primary, secondary, and post hoc endpoints.

METHODS:

Participants on stable NSAID therapy and with a history of inadequate response to other standard OA analgesics were enrolled in an 80-week (56-week treatment/24-week safety follow-up), randomized, NSAID-controlled, phase 3 study primarily designed to assess the safety of tanezumab for moderate-to-severe OA of the knee or hip. Participants received oral NSAID (twice daily naproxen, celecoxib, or diclofenac) or subcutaneous tanezumab (2.5mg or 5mg every 8 weeks). Non-responders were discontinued at week 16. Changes from baseline in WOMAC Pain and Physical Function, Patient's Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis (PGA-OA), and average pain in the index joint were compared between tanezumab and NSAID groups over the 56-week treatment period. Clinically meaningful response (e.g., ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in WOMAC Pain and Physical Function), rescue medication use, and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS:

All groups improved WOMAC Pain, WOMAC Physical Function, PGA-OA, and average pain in the index joint over the 56-week treatment period relative to baseline. Across all groups, improvements generally occurred from the time of first assessment (week 1 or 2) to week 16 and then slightly decreased from week 16 to 24 before stabilizing from weeks 24 to 56. The magnitude of improvement and the proportion of participants achieving ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in these measures was greater (unadjusted p≤0.05) with tanezumab than with NSAID at some timepoints on or before week 16. Adverse events of abnormal peripheral sensation, prespecified joint safety events, and total joint replacement surgery occurred more frequently with tanezumab than with NSAID.

CONCLUSIONS:

Tanezumab and NSAID both provided early and sustained (up to 56 weeks) efficacy relative to baseline. Improvements in pain and function were clinically meaningful in a substantial proportion of participants. Adverse events of abnormal peripheral sensation and joint safety events occurred more frequently with tanezumab than with NSAID.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02528188 . Registered on 19 July 2015.

• Authors: Tuhina Neogi, David J Hunter, Melvin Churchill, Ivan Shirinsky, Alexander White, Ali Guermazi, Masanari Omata, Robert J Fountaine, Glenn Pixton, Lars Viktrup, Mark T Brown, Christine R West, Kenneth M Verburg
• Journal: Arthritis research & therapy (Arthritis Res Ther) Vol. 24 Issue 1 Pg. 78 (03 29 2022) ISSN: 1478-6362 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 35351194 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
• Copyright: © 2022. The Author(s).

Chemical References

• Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
• tanezumab

Topics

• Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal (therapeutic use)
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
• Double-Blind Method
• Humans
• Osteoarthritis, Hip (drug therapy)
• Osteoarthritis, Knee (complications, drug therapy)
• Pain Measurement (methods)
• Treatment Outcome