Abstract | BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of penetrating isolated diaphragmatic injuries can be challenging because they are usually asymptomatic. Diagnosis by chest X-ray (CXR) is unreliable, while CT scan is reported to be more valuable. This study evaluated the diagnostic ability of CXR and CT in patients with proven DI. METHODS: RESULTS: 230 patients were included, 62 (27%) of which had isolated pDI, while 168 (73%) had associated abdominal or chest trauma. Of the 221 patients with proven DI and preoperative CXR, the CXR showed hemo/ pneumothorax in 99 (45%), elevated diaphragm in 51 (23%), and diaphragmatic hernia in 4 (1.8%). In 86 (39%) patients, the CXR was normal. In 126 patients with pDI and preoperative CT, imaging showed hemo/ pneumothorax in 95 (75%), hemoperitoneum in 66 (52%), pneumoperitoneum in 35 (28%), definitive DI in 56 (44%), suspected DI in 26 (21%), and no abnormality in 3 (2%). Of the 57 patients with isolated pDI the CXR showed a hemo/ pneumothorax in 24 (42%), elevated diaphragm in 14 (25%) and was normal in 24 (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Radiologic diagnosis of DI is unreliable. CT scan is much more sensitive than CXR. Laparoscopic evaluation should be considered liberally, irrespective of radiological findings.
|
Authors | Camilla Cremonini, Meghan R Lewis, Dominik Jakob, Elizabeth R Benjamin, Massimo Chiarugi, Demetrios Demetriades |
Journal | Injury
(Injury)
Vol. 53
Issue 1
Pg. 116-121
(Jan 2022)
ISSN: 1879-0267 [Electronic] Netherlands |
PMID | 34607700
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
Topics |
- Abdominal Injuries
(diagnostic imaging)
- Diaphragm
(diagnostic imaging)
- Humans
- Retrospective Studies
- Thoracic Injuries
(diagnostic imaging)
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Wounds, Nonpenetrating
- Wounds, Penetrating
(diagnostic imaging)
|