Association of Advanced Airway Insertion Timing and Outcomes After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE:

While often prioritized in the resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the optimal timing of advanced airway insertion is unknown. We evaluated the association between the timing of advanced airway (laryngeal tube and endotracheal intubation) insertion attempt and survival to hospital discharge in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS:

We performed a secondary analysis of the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial (PART), a clinical trial comparing the effects of laryngeal tube and endotracheal intubation on outcomes after adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We stratified the cohort by randomized airway strategy (laryngeal tube or endotracheal intubation). Within each subset, we defined a time-dependent propensity score using patients, arrest, and emergency medical services systems characteristics. Using the propensity score, we matched each patient receiving an initial attempt of laryngeal tube or endotracheal intubation with a patient at risk of receiving laryngeal tube or endotracheal intubation attempt within the same minute.

RESULTS:

Of 2,146 eligible patients, 1,091 (50.8%) and 1,055 (49.2%) were assigned to initial laryngeal tube and endotracheal intubation strategies, respectively. In the propensity score-matched cohort, timing of laryngeal tube insertion attempt was not associated with survival to hospital discharge: 0 to lesser than 5 minutes (risk ratio [RR]=1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 3.44); 5 to lesser than10 minutes (RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.73); 10 to lesser than 15 minutes (RR=1.17, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.31); or 15 to lesser than 20 minutes (RR=2.09, 95% CI 0.35 to 12.47) after advanced life support arrival. Timing of endotracheal intubation attempt was also not associated with survival: 0 to lesser than 5 minutes (RR=0.50, 95% CI 0.05 to 4.87); 5 to lesser than10 minutes (RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.81); 10 to lesser than15 minutes (RR=1.03, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.14); 15 to lesser than 20 minutes (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.42); or more than/equal to 20 minutes (RR=0.71, 95% CI 0.07 to 7.14).

CONCLUSION:

In the PART, timing of advanced airway insertion attempt was not associated with survival to hospital discharge.

• Authors: Masashi Okubo, Sho Komukai, Junichi Izawa, Tom P Aufderheide, Justin L Benoit, Jestin N Carlson, Mohamud R Daya, Matthew Hansen, Ahamed H Idris, Nancy Le, Joshua R Lupton, Graham Nichol, Henry E Wang, Clifton W Callaway
• Journal: Annals of emergency medicine (Ann Emerg Med) Vol. 79 Issue 2 Pg. 118-131 (02 2022) ISSN: 1097-6760 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 34538500 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Topics

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Female
• Humans
• Intubation, Intratracheal (methods)
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (mortality, therapy)
• Propensity Score
• Resuscitation (methods)
• Retrospective Studies
• Time-to-Treatment
• Treatment Outcome
• Young Adult