Abstract | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: METHODS: All cases meeting the eligibility criteria received two different treatment modalities over a span of 18 months. At the analysis stage, the final sample size comprised 70 patients, with 35 patients appropriated in each group. Group A patients received ZOE and Group B received PRF. Pain scores were measured on "1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th" days based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and compared in both groups of patients. The collected data were analyzed using the chi-square test, t test, and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: In patients treated with ZOE dressing, the average VAS scores observed were 7.4 ± 1.5, 5.1 ± 1.1, 3.4 ± 0.9, and 2.1 ± 0.7, respectively, on the "1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th" follow-up days. In patients treated with PRF, the average VAS score observed were 4.1 ± 1.2, 2.6 ± 0.9, 1.7 ± 0.9, and 0.8 ± 0.8 respectively. CONCLUSION: Both ZOE and PRF were effective in pain control during the follow-up period. However, the pain intensity measured as a pain score using VAS was, lower in the PRF group than in the ZOE group on all follow-up days.
|
Authors | Satheesh Reeshma, Chacko Pearl Dain |
Journal | Health science reports
(Health Sci Rep)
Vol. 4
Issue 3
Pg. e354
(Sep 2021)
ISSN: 2398-8835 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 34401528
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Copyright | © 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. |