HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Recommended primary outcomes for clinical trials evaluating hemostatic blood products and agents in patients with bleeding: Proceedings of a National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and US Department of Defense Consensus Conference.

AbstractABSTRACT:
High-quality evidence guiding optimal transfusion and other supportive therapies to reduce bleeding is needed to improve outcomes for patients with either severe bleeding or hemostatic disorders that are associated with poor outcomes. Alongside challenges in performing high-quality clinical trials in patient populations who are at risk of bleeding or who are actively bleeding, the interpretation of research evaluating hemostatic agents has been limited by inconsistency in the choice of primary trial outcomes. This lack of standardization of primary endpoints or outcomes decreases the ability of clinicians to assess the validity of endpoints and compare research results across studies, impairs meta-analytic efforts, and, ultimately, delays the translation of research results into clinical practice. To address this challenge, an international panel of experts was convened by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and the US Department of Defense on September 23 and 24, 2019, to develop expert opinion, consensus-based recommendations for primary clinical trial outcomes for pivotal trials in pediatric and adult patients with six categories in various clinical settings. This publication documents the conference proceedings from the workshop funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and the US Department of Defense that consolidated expert opinion regarding clinically meaningful outcomes across a wide range of disciplines to provide guidance for outcomes of future trials of hemostatic products and agents for patients with active bleeding.
AuthorsPhilip C Spinella, Nahed El Kassar, Andrew P Cap, Andrei L Kindzelski, Christopher S Almond, Alan Barkun, Terry B Gernsheimer, Joshua N Goldstein, John B Holcomb, Alfonso Iorio, Dennis M Jensen, Nigel S Key, Jerrold H Levy, Stephan A Mayer, Ernest E Moore, Simon J Stanworth, Roger J Lewis, Marie E Steiner, Hemostasis Trials Outcomes Working Group
JournalThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery (J Trauma Acute Care Surg) Vol. 91 Issue 2S Suppl 2 Pg. S19-S25 (08 01 2021) ISSN: 2163-0763 [Electronic] United States
PMID34039915 (Publication Type: Consensus Development Conference, NIH, Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Hemostatics
Topics
  • Blood Loss, Surgical (prevention & control)
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures (adverse effects)
  • Endpoint Determination (standards)
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (drug therapy)
  • Hemophilia A (drug therapy)
  • Hemorrhage (drug therapy, etiology)
  • Hemostatics (therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Intracranial Hemorrhages (drug therapy)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic (methods, standards)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wounds and Injuries (complications)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: