HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

PREVENT-DM Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Lifestyle Intervention and Metformin.

AbstractINTRODUCTION:
Although the Diabetes Prevention Program and other clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of intensive lifestyle interventions (ILI) and metformin to prevent type 2 diabetes, no studies have tested their comparative effects in pragmatic settings. This study was designed to compare the real-world effectiveness of ILI, metformin, and standard care among Hispanic women (Latinas) with prediabetes.
STUDY DESIGN:
RCT.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS:
Ninety-two Latinas, who had a mean hemoglobin A1c of 5.9%, BMI of 33.3 kg/m2, and waist circumference of 97.4 cm (38.3 inches), were recruited from an urban community and randomly assigned to ILI, metformin, or standard care using 1:1:1 allocation. Data were collected from 2013-2015 and analyzed in 2016.
INTERVENTION:
The 12-month ILI was adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program's ILI and delivered by community health workers (promotoras) over 24 sessions. Metformin participants received 850 mg twice daily. Those randomized to standard care continued their regular medical care.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Weight and secondary outcomes (waist circumference, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and lipids) were assessed at baseline and 12 months.
RESULTS:
ILI participants demonstrated significantly greater mean weight loss (-4.0 kg, 5.0%) than metformin (-0.9 kg, 1.1%) and standard care participants (+0.8 kg, 0.9%) (p<0.001). The difference in weight loss between metformin and standard care was not significant. The ILI group experienced a greater reduction in waist circumference than standard care (p=0.001), and a marginal improvement in hemoglobin A1c compared with metformin and standard care (p=0.063).
CONCLUSIONS:
In the first comparative effectiveness trial of diabetes prevention treatments, a 12-month ILI produced significantly greater weight loss than metformin and standard care among Latinas with prediabetes. These data suggest that ILI delivered by promotoras is an effective strategy for preventing diabetes in this high-risk group, which may be superior to metformin. Future pragmatic trials involving larger samples should examine differences in diabetes incidence associated with these treatments.
AuthorsMatthew J O'Brien, Alberly Perez, Adam B Scanlan, Victor A Alos, Robert C Whitaker, Gary D Foster, Ronald T Ackermann, Jody D Ciolino, Carol Homko
JournalAmerican journal of preventive medicine (Am J Prev Med) Vol. 52 Issue 6 Pg. 788-797 (Jun 2017) ISSN: 1873-2607 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID28237635 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
CopyrightCopyright © 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Glycated Hemoglobin A
  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Metformin
Topics
  • Female
  • Glycated Hemoglobin (analysis)
  • Hispanic or Latino (statistics & numerical data)
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Life Style (ethnology)
  • Metformin (therapeutic use)
  • Middle Aged
  • Prediabetic State (drug therapy, ethnology)
  • Waist Circumference
  • Weight Loss

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: