Abstract | AIM: In the present study, we assessed the patterns and types of antibiotics prescribed following tooth extractions, and the alignment of these practices with the evidence available. METHODS: RESULTS: More than 50 000 extraction events were analyzed. The findings show no consistency in prescribing patterns. The same percentage (10%) of the healthy and the chronically ill patients undergoing an exposed (simple) tooth extraction were prescribed antibiotics, while approximately 50% of both healthy and chronically ill patient groups undergoing an impacted tooth extraction received a prescription. Almost 81% of prescriptions were for narrow spectrum antibiotics, with few differences across the four event types. CONCLUSIONS: The antibiotic prescription patterns of dental practitioners reported in the present study do not appear to follow a coherent set of guidelines or meaningful indications for antibiotic use. The study highlights the need for explicit and more prudent guidelines for the use of antibiotics following tooth extractions, to reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance.
|
Authors | Ratilal Lalloo, Geetesh Solanki, Khabiso Ramphoma, Neil G Myburgh |
Journal | Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry
(J Investig Clin Dent)
Vol. 8
Issue 4
(Nov 2017)
ISSN: 2041-1626 [Electronic] Australia |
PMID | 27778471
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Copyright | © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. |
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
(therapeutic use)
- Drug Prescriptions
(statistics & numerical data)
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Postoperative Care
- Practice Patterns, Dentists'
- South Africa
- Tooth Extraction
|