HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Pleural mesothelioma and lung cancer risks in relation to occupational history and asbestos lung burden.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
We have conducted a population-based study of pleural mesothelioma patients with occupational histories and measured asbestos lung burdens in occupationally exposed workers and in the general population. The relationship between lung burden and risk, particularly at environmental exposure levels, will enable future mesothelioma rates in people born after 1965 who never installed asbestos to be predicted from their asbestos lung burdens.
METHODS:
Following personal interview asbestos fibres longer than 5 µm were counted by transmission electron microscopy in lung samples obtained from 133 patients with mesothelioma and 262 patients with lung cancer. ORs for mesothelioma were converted to lifetime risks.
RESULTS:
Lifetime mesothelioma risk is approximately 0.02% per 1000 amphibole fibres per gram of dry lung tissue over a more than 100-fold range, from 1 to 4 in the most heavily exposed building workers to less than 1 in 500 in most of the population. The asbestos fibres counted were amosite (75%), crocidolite (18%), other amphiboles (5%) and chrysotile (2%).
CONCLUSIONS:
The approximate linearity of the dose-response together with lung burden measurements in younger people will provide reasonably reliable predictions of future mesothelioma rates in those born since 1965 whose risks cannot yet be seen in national rates. Burdens in those born more recently will indicate the continuing occupational and environmental hazards under current asbestos control regulations. Our results confirm the major contribution of amosite to UK mesothelioma incidence and the substantial contribution of non-occupational exposure, particularly in women.
AuthorsClare Gilham, Christine Rake, Garry Burdett, Andrew G Nicholson, Leslie Davison, Angelo Franchini, James Carpenter, John Hodgson, Andrew Darnton, Julian Peto
JournalOccupational and environmental medicine (Occup Environ Med) Vol. 73 Issue 5 Pg. 290-9 (May 2016) ISSN: 1470-7926 [Electronic] England
PMID26715106 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightPublished by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Chemical References
  • Asbestos, Amphibole
  • Asbestos, Serpentine
  • Mineral Fibers
  • Asbestos, Crocidolite
  • Asbestos, Amosite
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Asbestos, Amosite (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Asbestos, Amphibole (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Asbestos, Crocidolite (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Asbestos, Serpentine (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Asbestosis (complications)
  • Employment
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung (chemistry, pathology)
  • Lung Neoplasms (chemically induced, pathology)
  • Male
  • Mesothelioma (chemically induced, pathology)
  • Mesothelioma, Malignant
  • Middle Aged
  • Mineral Fibers (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Occupational Diseases (chemically induced, pathology)
  • Occupational Exposure (adverse effects)
  • Pleural Neoplasms (chemically induced, pathology)
  • Risk Assessment

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: