Abstract | BACKGROUND/AIMS: METHODOLOGY: The present study project was a prospective, randomized investigation. The study was performed in the Department of General, Emergency and Transplant Surgery St Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital (Bologna, Italy). Subjects were divided in two groups: in the first group the patient was submitted to LC while in the second group was submitted to OC. RESULTS: Of 164 consecutive patients, 20 were excluded from the study. The two groups were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics. Seven (9.7%) patients in the LC group required conversion to OC. There were no deaths or bile duct lesions in either group, and the postoperative complication rate was similar (p=n.s.). The mean postoperative hospital stay was also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Even though LC for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis is technically demanding, in experienced hands it is safe and effective. It does not increase the mortality and the morbidity rate with a low conversion rate and no difference in hospital stay.
|
Authors | Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni, Elisa Bianchi, Salomone Di Saverio, Federico Coccolini, Carlo Vallicelli, Daniel Lazzareschi, Massimo Sartelli, Annalisa Amaduzzi, Annalisa Amaduzz, Antonio D Pinna |
Journal | Hepato-gastroenterology
(Hepatogastroenterology)
Vol. 60
Issue 127
Pg. 1552-6
(Oct 2013)
ISSN: 0172-6390 [Print] Greece |
PMID | 24634923
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Topics |
- Chi-Square Distribution
- Cholecystectomy
(adverse effects, methods)
- Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
(adverse effects)
- Cholecystitis, Acute
(diagnosis, surgery)
- Clinical Competence
- Female
- Humans
- Italy
- Length of Stay
- Male
- Postoperative Complications
(etiology)
- Prospective Studies
- Recovery of Function
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
|