HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Open-label, phase III trial evaluating whether sunitinib was superior or equivalent to sorafenib in hepatocellular cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Patients were stratified and randomly assigned to receive sunitinib 37.5 mg once per day or sorafenib 400 mg twice per day. Primary end point was overall survival (OS).
RESULTS:
Early trial termination occurred for futility and safety reasons. A total of 1,074 patients were randomly assigned to the study (sunitinib arm, n = 530; sorafenib arm, n = 544). For sunitinib and sorafenib, respectively, median OS was 7.9 versus 10.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; one-sided P = .9990; two-sided P = .0014); median progression-free survival (PFS; 3.6 v 3.0 months; HR, 1.13; one-sided P = .8785; two-sided P = .2286) and time to progression (TTP; 4.1 v 3.8 months; HR, 1.13; one-sided P = .8312; two-sided P = .3082) were comparable. Median OS was similar among Asian (7.7 v 8.8 months; HR, 1.21; one-sided P = .9829) and hepatitis B-infected patients (7.6 v 8.0 months; HR, 1.10; one-sided P = .8286), but was shorter with sunitinib in hepatitis C-infected patients (9.2 v 17.6 months; HR, 1.52; one-sided P = .9835). Sunitinib was associated with more frequent and severe adverse events (AEs) than sorafenib. Common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (29.7%) and neutropenia (25.7%) for sunitinib; hand-foot syndrome (21.2%) for sorafenib. Discontinuations owing to AEs were similar (sunitinib, 13.3%; sorafenib, 12.7%).
CONCLUSION:
OS with sunitinib was not superior or equivalent but was significantly inferior to sorafenib. OS was comparable in Asian and hepatitis B-infected patients. OS was superior in hepatitis C-infected patients who received sorafenib. Sunitinib-treated patients reported more frequent and severe toxicity.
AuthorsAnn-Lii Cheng, Yoon-Koo Kang, Deng-Yn Lin, Joong-Won Park, Masatoshi Kudo, Shukui Qin, Hyun-Cheol Chung, Xiangqun Song, Jianming Xu, Guido Poggi, Masao Omata, Susan Pitman Lowenthal, Silvana Lanzalone, Liqiang Yang, Maria Jose Lechuga, Eric Raymond
JournalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol) Vol. 31 Issue 32 Pg. 4067-75 (Nov 10 2013) ISSN: 1527-7755 [Electronic] United States
PMID24081937 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Indoles
  • Phenylurea Compounds
  • Pyrroles
  • Niacinamide
  • Sorafenib
  • Sunitinib
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular (drug therapy, mortality)
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Indoles (therapeutic use)
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Liver Neoplasms (drug therapy, mortality)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Niacinamide (analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Phenylurea Compounds (therapeutic use)
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Pyrroles (therapeutic use)
  • Sorafenib
  • Sunitinib
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: